Mario Ancic vs Ricardo Mello Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L W L L L
Form
L W L L W W L W L LHead To Head: Ancic 2 - 3 Mello
They have played 12 sets in total, with Ancic winning 6 and Mello winning 6. The last match between Ancic and Mello was at the Western & Southern Financial Group Masters - Cincinnati, 15-08-2005, First, Hard with Mario Ancic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mario Ancic | 2 |
| Ricardo Mello | 3 |
Western & Southern Financial Group Masters - Cincinnati(15-08-2005)
6
2
6
3
| Ancic | Stats | Mello |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 7 | Highest Rank | 50 |
| 41 | Age | 44 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 7 | Titles | 16 |
| 62% (302-188) | Career Total W/L | 56% (394-304) |
| $1,915,135 | Career Prize Money | $417,225 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 3 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(2) 6-3 | |||||
| 3-6 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| 6-2 2-6 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 54 | Games Won | 52 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mario Ancic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniel Koellerer
Player
Mario Ancic
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivo Minar
Player
Mario Ancic
50%
(
66 of
131)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
51%
(
33 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
109
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Mario Ancic
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
9
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Mario Ancic
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mario Ancic
Player
Julien Benneteau
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
55 of
87)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
124)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Ancic
Player
Bobby Reynolds
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
12
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Ricardo Mello Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Alund
Player
Ricardo Mello
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
52 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Alund
Player
Ricardo Mello
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Mello
Player
Maximiliano Estevez
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guido Pella
Player
Ricardo Mello
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardo Mello
Player
Joao Souza
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
42 of
48)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
33 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Mello
Player
Fabiano De Paula
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Hocevar
Player
Ricardo Mello
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andre Ghem
Player
Ricardo Mello
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Mello
Player
Facundo Bagnis
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grega Zemlja
Player
Ricardo Mello
60%
(
84 of
141)
1st Serve %
72%
(
77 of
107)
16
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
77)
53%
(
30 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
33%
(
47 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
107)
130
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (302/188) | Win/Loss | 56% (394/304) |
| 58% (718/519) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (924/755) |
| 53% (6477/5734) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8229/7633) |
| 60% (116/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (232/133) |
| 53% (42/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (148/133) |
| 64% (98/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 21% (6/23) |
| 73% (46/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 35% (8/15) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1616 | Aces Total | 548 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 425 | Total Double Faults | 482 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 491.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 577.65 |
| 62% (8673/14043) | 1st Serve % | 63% (9247/14658) |
| 76% (6565/8673) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6237/9199) |
| 52% (2769/5376) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2776/5384) |
| 39% (503/1288) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (552/1361) |
| 37% (5414/14478) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5696/14752) |
| 68% (48/23) | Slam W/L | 48% (33/36) |
| 50% (41/41) | Masters W/L | 48% (19/21) |
| 48% (12/13) | Cups W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 65% (127/69) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (71/74) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (69/39) | Challenger W/L | 61% (264/166) |
| 71% (5/2) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (252/408) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (377/657) |
| 62% (49/79) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 52% (121/231) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (117/213) |
| 64% (93/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (112/226) |
| 90% (283/255) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (364/316) |
| 10% (283/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (364/48) |
| 22% (206/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (334/78) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
